吐血了，他竟然写了那么多，我看都懒得看……………………直接复制过来，有闲人的话去回他个吧。。。。
我的火狐不会自动换行，为了避免滚动条被拉太长，我乱加回车了。。用其它浏览器的同仁担待些吧
fritz says:
a shorter path is neat and the capability of finishing games with such surely indicates
a good understanding of the game. but much more important when trying to achieve
good times is the ability to save clicks and reduce hesitations during the solve. in a
lot of cases it is simply faster to choose a slightly longer path that allows a more
time- and click-efficient solving. if you are just looking for the all-time shortest path,
i recommend going back to the post from when matthew rendo joined this page
(2007). he posted some nice stats followed by the only discussion about mouse
path i've witnessed on here. hmm...maybe i feel motivated to play some more and
try to get sub4000 path.
Posted on : 2012-03-16 02:26:49
fritz says:
and since you posted again while i was replying: what's the point in excluding all
but less than 100 people from the challenge to set a record there? for a lot of
people 91s would be a truely great time. is a sub50 on 100 3bv with 4000 path
better than a sub50 on 200 3bv with 8000 path? i don't think that playing for
speed and playing for shortest path should be combined. that's like combinging
time with ioe or with fewest clicks. in some cases there might be a correlation
but there are enough examples which suggest that good scores can be done
whilst not caring for these indices.
Posted on : 2012-03-16 02:37:26
|
|
国际网现在打不开的样子。。。呃，准备再加上一句表示懒得理他了……